The Big Short by Michael Lewis delves into the lead-up to the 2007-2008 financial crisis, focusing on a few individuals who foresaw the collapse of the housing market and profited from it. This detailed narrative brings into focus the actions and motivations of key players in the financial world who recognized the impending disaster and took steps to capitalize on it. The book not only sheds light on the mechanics of the financial instruments that contributed to the crisis but also critiques the broader Wall Street culture that allowed such a catastrophe to occur.
The Prologue: A Personal Insight
Lewis begins the book with a personal account of his time on Wall Street in the 1980s. As a bond salesman at Salomon Brothers, he witnessed firsthand the corrupt practices that eventually led to financial instability. His first book, Liar’s Poker, was written with the hope that exposing these practices would lead to change. However, instead of reform, the industry became more adept at hiding its unethical behavior. The Big Short, written in 2011, is a continuation of Lewis’s critique, focusing on the financial crisis of 2007-2008, which he believes has roots in the practices of the 1980s.
Steve Eisman and Michael Burry: Outsiders with Insight
In the early chapters, Lewis introduces two key figures: Steve Eisman and Michael Burry. Eisman was known for his brash personality and his willingness to challenge the status quo on Wall Street. He was deeply cynical about the industry, particularly after the death of his infant son, which only intensified his belief that Wall Street operated with a singular, ruthless creed: “fuck the poor.” With the help of his colleague, Vincent Daniel, Eisman began investigating the subprime lending industry, searching for weaknesses or corrupt practices that he could exploit.
Around the same time, Michael Burry, a former neurologist with a passion for finance, started his own hedge fund, Scion Capital. Burry had a unique ability to analyze financial markets and predict trends, which quickly brought him success. However, when he decided to bet against the subprime mortgage bond market, his investors were skeptical. The prevailing belief was that the subprime market was solid, and Burry’s decision seemed reckless. Despite significant pushback from his investors and personal challenges, including the diagnosis of his son (and later himself) with Asperger’s syndrome, Burry remained convinced that the subprime market would collapse.
Understanding the Subprime Mortgage Crisis
As the narrative progresses, Lewis shifts focus from these individual characters to explain the complexities of Wall Street and the financial instruments that played a key role in the crisis. The subprime mortgage industry, initially designed to make homeownership more accessible, became a tool for financial manipulation. Subprime loans were given to borrowers with poor credit histories, often under terms they could not realistically meet. These risky loans were then bundled together into mortgage bonds and sold to investors.
One of the central financial instruments in this process was the Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO). A CDO was a complex financial product that combined multiple mortgage bonds, often the riskiest ones, into a single security. These CDOs were then divided into tranches, or layers, with the riskiest bonds at the bottom and the supposedly safest at the top. The problem was that these CDOs were often misrepresented as safe investments, with even the riskiest tranches receiving high credit ratings like triple-A. This misrepresentation allowed Wall Street to offload enormous amounts of risk onto unsuspecting investors, including pension funds and insurance companies.
Lewis compares the CDO to a "credit-laundering service" for risky subprime loans. By bundling these loans together and selling them as high-quality investments, Wall Street effectively hid the true level of risk involved. This practice created a bubble in the housing market, as more and more people were given loans they could not afford, and the demand for housing skyrocketed. When homeowners inevitably began to default on their loans, the entire system started to unravel.
Cornwall Capital: Betting Big Against Wall Street
In the later chapters, Lewis introduces the story of Cornwall Capital, a small investment firm founded by Charlie Ledley and Jamie Mai. With little experience in finance, Ledley and Mai started their firm with a belief in thinking big and taking calculated risks. They believed that Wall Street, with its focus on short-term profits and narrow expertise, was overlooking significant long-term risks. Cornwall Capital specialized in buying long-term options, or “long shots,” that they believed were undervalued but had the potential to pay off big in the future.
As they delved deeper into the financial markets, Ledley and Mai became convinced that the subprime mortgage market was destined to fail. However, instead of betting against the lower-rated bonds that others like Burry and Eisman were targeting, Cornwall Capital decided to bet against the higher-rated, triple-A bonds. They believed that even these supposedly safe bonds were vulnerable to collapse, and they placed their bets accordingly.
Cornwall Capital’s strategy was risky but ultimately successful. By entering the market later than others, they had the advantage of more information and a clearer understanding of the impending crisis. Their bet against the most secure bonds turned out to be highly profitable when the market finally crashed.
The Financial Crash and Its Aftermath
The climax of The Big Short is the 2007-2008 financial crash, a catastrophic event that caught most of Wall Street and the global economy by surprise. However, for the central characters in the book—Eisman, Burry, and the team at Cornwall Capital—the crash was not unexpected. They had seen it coming and positioned themselves to profit from the collapse. As the housing market imploded, these investors reaped enormous financial rewards.
Yet, despite their success, the victory felt hollow. The crisis they had predicted brought untold suffering to millions of people, from homeowners who lost their properties to workers who lost their jobs. The characters in The Big Short were left with a sense of unease, knowing that their gains came at the expense of a broader economic collapse.
In the aftermath of the crisis, Lewis points out that Wall Street has not fundamentally changed. The same reckless behavior that led to the 2007-2008 crash continues to this day, albeit under different names and slightly altered practices. The financial industry has shown a remarkable ability to adapt and survive, often at the expense of the broader economy.
The Big Short serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked greed and the need for greater transparency and accountability in the financial sector. The book underscores the importance of understanding the complexities of financial markets and the potential consequences of allowing a small group of individuals to wield enormous power without sufficient oversight.
.webp)
%20(1).webp)